Rewilding as a strategy for post-war ecosystem recovery in Ukraine
Abstract
It has been established that the concept of rewilding is an effective, strategically sound, and economically viable tool for ecosystem restoration in Ukraine during the post-war period. The environmental impact of military operations has been assessed: as of late 2024, damages exceeded €60 billion, affecting over 20 % of fertile lands and resulting in the loss of more than 1 million hectares of forest resources. It is determined that traditional reclamation and artificial afforestation methods are often ineffective and resource-intensive under conditions of large-scale landmine contamination, toxic soil pollution, and limited financial resources. The potential of nature-based solutions has been substantiated, with rewilding ensuring self-regulating ecosystem regeneration with minimal anthropogenic intervention and the restoration of natural successional processes. The phenomenon of "war-wilding" has been characterized as the spontaneous return of wildlife in areas where economic activity ceased due to hostilities. Using the Velykyi Luh case study, it is demonstrated that following the destruction of the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant, floodplain ecosystems and young forest communities began forming over an area of approximately 1,000 km2. These ecosystems are estimated to sequester up to 120 million tons of CO2 in the long term, partially offsetting climate-related losses. A comparison of traditional and innovative approaches shows that rewilding offers lower costs, long-term ecological benefits, and additional socio-economic advantages, including the development of ecotourism, nature-based enterprises, and carbon farming. The practical significance of these findings for shaping national environmental recovery policy is identified, involving the introduction of "rewilding territory" status, financial incentives for natural reforestation, and their integration into the national ecological network. Examples such as the Tarutynskyi Steppe, the Danube Delta, and the "Beremytske" Nature Park demonstrate that rewilding performs both ecological and socio-rehabilitative functions, contributing to the psychological recovery of veterans and internally displaced persons. It is established that a rewilding strategy enables Ukraine to transition toward resilient future ecosystems in alignment with the European Green Deal and post-war environmental transformation goals.
Downloads
References
Beremytske Nature Park. (n.d.). URL: https://beremytske.com.ua/
Elbakidze, M., Kuns, B., Gunko, R., Kruhlov, I., Maslyukivska, O., Karamushka, V., Adamenko, O., Holub, O., Kleba, L., Melnyk, Y., Mylysiuk, Y., Pidust, O., Slobodian, I., Tkachenko, Y., & Yamelynets, T. (2025). Understanding the impact of the war on people – nature relationships in Ukraine. Ecosystem Services, 73, article ID 101725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101725
Environmental Justice Foundation. (2025). Freshwater wetlands: Why conserving freshwater wetlands is a climate imperative (Report). Environmental Justice Foundation, 56 p. URL: https://ejfoundation.org/resources/downloads/Freshwater-wetlands-climate-report-2025.pdf
Global Rewilding Alliance. (2024). Help rewilding in Ukraine: Restoration initiatives in the face of war, 360 p. URL: https://globalrewilding.earth/
Jepson, P., & Blythe, C. (2020). Rewilding: The radical new science of ecological recovery. Oryx, 55(2), 319–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320001441
Khodosovtsev, O. Y., & Pylypenko, I. O. (2023). Environmental consequences of the destruction of the Kakhovka HPP dam: From catastrophe to restoration of natural ecosystems. Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, (9), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2023.09.034
Kvasha, S. M., & Vytvytska, O. D. (2024). Economic assessment of environmental damage to Ukraine's agricultural sector caused by military actions. Economics of Agro-Industrial Complex, (2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202402015
Leal Filho, W., Fedoruk, M., Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Splodytel, A., Smaliychuk, A., & Szynkowska-Jóźwik, M. I. (2024). The environment as the first victim: The impacts of the war on the preservation areas in Ukraine. Journal of Environmental Management, 351, article ID 121399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121399
Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2022). Order No. 167 "On approval of the methodology for determining the amount of damage caused to land and soils as a result of emergencies and/or armed aggression and hostilities". URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0406-22#Text
Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources of Ukraine. (2024). Official report on the state of the environment in Ukraine under armed aggression. URL: https://mepr.gov.ua/
Novakovska, I., Belousova, N., & Hunko, L. (2025). Land degradation in Ukraine as a result of military operations. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 24(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.9788
Pomazanna, A., Shevchenko, M., & Bonchkovskyi, O. (2025). Potential of treating war-polluted soils for earth-based construction in Ukraine. In M. Posani & S. Singh (Eds.), RILEM Youth Symposium 2025 – RYS2025 (RILEM Bookseries, vol. 67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35238.59209
Rewilding Danube Delta. (n.d.). URL: https://rewilding-danube-delta.com/
Rewilding Europe. (n.d.). URL: https://rewildingeurope.com/
Rewilding Ukraine. (2024). Restoration of the Tarutyn Steppe: Results and prospects. URL: https://rewilding-ukraine.org/
Sanina, I. V., & Liuta, N. H. (2023). Environmental consequences of the destruction of the Kakhovka HPP dam and ways to improve water supply for the population. Mineral Resources of Ukraine, (2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.31996/mru.2023.2.50-55
Shumilova, O., Sukhodolov, A., Osadcha, N., et al. (2025). Environmental effects of the Kakhovka Dam destruction by warfare in Ukraine. Science, 387(6739), 1181–1186. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn8655
Spinova, Y., & Vasyliuk, O. (2024). Post-war rewilding as a decision-making influence factor. EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 April 2024, pp. 26–31. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-21661
Svenning, J. C., Pedersen, P. B., Donlan, C. J., Ejrnæs, R., Faurby, S., Galetti, M., & Vera, F. W. (2016). Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(4), 898–906. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502556112
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (2024). Concept note: A Platform for Action on the Green Recovery of Ukraine (11 June 2024). URL: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Concept%20Note_A%20Platform%20for%20Action%20on%20the%20Green%20Recovery%20of%20Uraine%2011.6.24.pdf
UWEC Work Group. (2022). Environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14679.55207
UWEC Work Group. (n.d.). [In Ukrainian]. URL: https://uwecworkgroup.info/



